IN THIS TIME of perpetual Cincinnati Bengals incompetence and futility, with zero playoff wins in the nineteen seasons since the WhoDeyRevolution Godfather, Paul Brown, passed away in 1991 and handed the team to his fortunate son, the Despot, Mike Brown;
Introduction
WE, the members of the Who Dey Revolution, in our fervent dedication to the Cincinnati Bengals and fanatical desire to transform our hometown team into perpetual Super Bowl contenders, call for a popular revolution of fans to demand comprehensive reform to the managerial decisions and approach of Cincinnati Bengals ownership, management, staff and players, and hereby call for the adoption of the following Who Dey Revolution Manifesto:
Manifesto Demands
THAT the Mike Brown, Katie Blackburn, Marvin Lewis, along with every other member of the Bengals management, staff and personnel, state publicly to all Bengals fans, “I will do everything in my power to help the Cincinnati Bengals win a Super Bowl;”
THAT Mike Brown will hire a general manager, drastically expand the scouting department and relinquish all control of player personnel;
THAT all training, rehabilitation and medical facilities are considered best-in-class compared to other NFL teams;
THAT the management fill the team only with players who fit the system, both mentally and physically, and are not reluctant to makes changes to player personnel when needed, regardless of cost or loyalty concerns;
THAT offensive and defensive line depth is considered the top priority for all player personnel decisions;
THAT all decisions made by ownership, management, staff and players, both on and off the field, are judged only by this criterion: “Does this help the Cincinnati Bengals win a Super Bowl?”
As first brought to our attention by Ben, and then immediatly after by Colin (so close!), someone has been having some fun with Bob Bratkowski's wikipedia page. Here is a screenshot of the edited page, taken from SI's Extra Mustard (it has now been changed to a more standard and far less accurate version).
If you want to see some of WDR's previous coverage on Brat, click here or on any of the more colorfully named hashtags appended to this post below.
Since I didn't get to watch the game this weekend, I can't comment on the actual X's & O's this week, but I can comment on this: I HAVE HAD ENOUGH OF BRATKOWSKI'S BULLSHIT PLAY CALLING & LEWIS FALLING ON THE SWORD FOR HIM.
Following the game on my iPhone thanks to ESPN’s Game-tracker on my drive home from Virginia Beach, for three quarters, it looked like things were going pretty well: a couple of nice long scoring drives, but it didn’t look like I was missing anything too dramatic outside of the TO TD, and Benson's performance. Then we get to the fourth quarter, and "SQUIRREL!"
First of all, Lewis’s excuse that they were being aggressive is complete horseshit, and the media needs to call him out on this. The play calling speaks for itself.
Starting with the second drive of the forth quarter, Bengals ahead 21-14, starting on the Bengals’s 6 with 8:51 to play: 1-10, Benson run; 2-6, Benson run; 3-1, Benson run; 1-10, Palmer 4 yard pass to TO; 2-6, Benson run; & 3-2, Leonard run for a loss of two yards. REAL AGGRESSIVE PLAY CALLING ASSHOLE.
Bucs get the ball back on starting on their own 20 with 4:51 left in the game. Zimmer forces them into three downs and out, and the Bengals get the ball back starting on their own 41 with 3:17 left to play. They are only 60 yards away from ending the game with a statement, or if they can just get a couple of first downs and we walk off the field with another unconvincing win.
Brat comes out guns blazing on first down: Benson up the gut for zero yards; 2-10, Benson off LT for a 2 yard gain.
Before I go any further, if you are attacking the Bucs to end the game by being aggressive as Lewis claimed, you don’t come out with two running plays most likely against eight men in the box. I am assuming the Bucs put eight in the box since they most likely knew the Bengals were going to try to run out the clock (please correct me if I am wrong about this). If you are aggressive, you come out and call a play action pass to take advantage of the defense looking for the run. I would have been 100% in support of being aggressive and taking this risk because it could have put the game away with one play. Instead, the Bengals were basically running against a wall that our OL is not good enough to break through. Forget the idea that we were averaging over 6 yards a carry for the game, it doesn't apply when the opposing defense stacks the deck to shut down the run. Sure enough, we tried to run out the clock and we weren't able to move the ball against a defense looking for it. REAL AGGRESSIVE PLAY CALLING ASSHOLE.
Next play is a false start on Gresham, pushing it to 3rd & 13 with 2:28 to play. From the highlights, the Bucs bring out what looks to be their dime package. Brat decides to still go for the first ignoring the potential disaster. Unfortunately Palmer doesn’t check down into his favorite laizze fare running play that has probably only netted us 10 yards in the past three seasons. Sure enough Palmer forces the throw into tight covereage and its behind TO. Results in 7 points for the Bucs.
This had to be the stupidest play call I have ever witnessed, second to Belicheck’s crazy forth down play call a couple of years ago. This “aggressive” play is nothing but a culmination of his incompetent decisions. You don’t throw the ball when the Bucs are expecting it, have their dime package on the field, and there is less then two and half minutes to play with only a seven point lead. In this case, there is too much to lose so do the always unsuccessful draw play and punt the ball to make the Bucs drive 80+ yards with less than 2 minutes left.
Ironically, it was only a couple of weeks ago that I called for his head because Bratkowski was too conservative against the Ravens and it almost cost us the game. I would have been perfectly fine with that approach Sunday.
If you want to be aggressive and attack the defense, then DO IT WHEN THEY AREN'T EXPECTING IT! Unfortunately, Mike Brown is not going to mess with his hand picked staff and this dumb ass is staying put to make my Sundays suck.
I would accept a Brian Billick hiring over continuing with this asshole, and from the looks of it TO would tend to agree since it sounds like he doesn’t like Brats route trees either. The video's cut right to the good stuff. My favorite part is his statement that he's been around some "great football minds"...the implication being he's not exactly seeing the same thing from his offensive coaching here.
"Hi, I'm Tom Brady. I know what you're thinking right now. How can my hair look like his? Well I'll let you in on a little secret. This hair product can't be bought in stores. It can't even be bought on the streets, unless you're in Pittsburgh, but let's be honest, Pittsburgh doesn't exist anymore. My hair is styled and coiffed with 100% horse splooge. Look at PeeWee on my arm. He's a little surprised that I'm giving away my secret, but I'll be damned if he hasn't dipped into the stables himself before. That little fucker knows a thing or two about equine wonders."
A clue in my never-ending-search-even-though-I-already-know-the-answer for why Bob Bratkowski will hold the offensive coordinator job in Cincinnati for 13 years and likely more. ESPN featured this article by Liz Merrill about Mike Zimmer as the lead on their homepage the other day. Surprisingly for ESPN, but unsurprisingly for Liz Merrill, it is very good.
I covered here my general thoughts on Brat and why I think he continues to lead the offense but I did not know the following:
The Zimmers and Bratkowskis have a deep history together. In 1980, Mike caught the garter at Bob and Rebecca's wedding. Bob and Mike were assistants together at Missouri, then coached under Price at Weber State. Back then, the staff was very family oriented.
Price's daughter would often babysit for his assistants' young children. And the wives would often lean on each other in their times of solitude. It was a sorority of sorts, among a handful of women who advised and chuckled and knew things the rest of the world couldn't understand.
And this:
The Bratkowskis had Mike, Corri and Marki over for Thanksgiving (last year). "I don't ever want him to feel like we're not in this with him," Rebecca Bratkowski says.
So clearly, now even I - hater of haters, second guesser of second guessers - can understand why Mike Brown chose personal over business when it came time to renew Brat's contract last season. It was a move in part to keep supportive friends around for Mike Zimmer.
Seriously though, read the whole article. There's tons of great stuff, like this part on how Zim casually dismisses his skin cancer diagnosis because he's a raging bad ass:
He was recently diagnosed with skin cancer and was advised to have surgery. Zimmer, 54, told his doctor that it would have to wait for a couple of weeks, when the Bengals returned from camp. "It's nothing," he says. "It really isn't. It's what they call basal cell; it's not a melanoma."
Zimmer to cancer: Your shit is weak.
Bottom line: it looks like as long as Zim stays, Brat will stay too. I'll just have to deal with it.
Assuming the inevitable, what exactly does it mean that the status quo will return on offense next season?
Let's take a gander at some stats from the last two years. In 2008, the Bengals were 32nd in the NFL on offense (based upon official NFL statistics. Football Outsiders had them at 28th. Anecdotally, this seems fair. No Carson Palmer meant lots of Ryan Fitzpatrick. Lots of Crazy Legs is good for comedy but bad for offensive production. The offense was painful to watch. No spark, no creativity, nothing. Some (everyone within the organization) would place 100% of the blame at Palmer's elbow. I don't feel like that's an accurate portrayal of how it went down, however. The offense was terrible the first two games of 2008 (against good defenses) mustering 3 and 7 points on offense, against the Ravens and Titans. An overtime defeat to the Giants and a loss in Dallas were decent games offensively, but certainly they didn't look like world beaters even with Carson.
This year, all excuses were gone. Carson was back and claimed to be 100% healthy. Housh was gone, but was replaced with Coles. The running game would be better. The offensive line greatly outperformed expectations. So the old Bengals offense was back, right? Maybe not the old Bengals, but at least a version of the Bengals offense that didn't suck. Well, we got a mediocre offense back. The unit ranked 24th by official NFL stats, 19th by Football Outsiders. Is that terrible? No, it was good enough to win 10 games. Considering that the organization feels Carson is a top-flight quarterback? It's terrible.
The most disturbing part of this all is the decline of Carson Palmer. Football Outsiders rates him as the 15th best quarterback by DYAR (total value) and 19th best quarterback by DVOA (per play value) for 2009. Is that acceptable? Sure, if your name is Trent Edwards. Can you win games with a quarterback playing at that level? Obviously. Can you win a championship? In 2010, I'm not sure that you can.
To me, bringing back everyone, especially the offensive coordinator, tells me that the Bengals feel all of this is OK. It's fine that the top paid quarterback in the league is playing like a mid-level starter. It's fine that the offense will continue to produce 17 points a game. It's fine if you don't strive for great, merely for good.
I mean, look at some of Carson's games. The first Cleveland game (23-44/230 yds/2 TD/1 INT/73.1 rat). The win in Pittsburgh (18-30/178/0/0/76.8). The loss in Minnesota (15-25/94/1/0/81.1). The record setting day in the Meadowlands (1-11/0/0/1/1.7). Hell, just look at the stats from his last 8 regular season games combined. During that stretch, Carson was 122 for 206 (59.2%) for 1,262 yards (157.75 a game) with 7 TDs and 6 INTs, for a QB rating of 76.15. This is the highest paid quarterback in the league!
Also, let us not forget that the Bengals offense is trending further and further back to the 1970s as the game evolves into more and more of a passers league. Of the 8 teams remaining in the playoffs, the Saints, Colts, Chargers, and Cardinals are all either pass heavy or much more effective passing than running. The Vikings, despite Adrian Peterson, threw it a lot better than they ran it this year. The Cowboys were effective both running and passing. Only the Ravens and Jets are run first teams, and both are expected to fall this weekend.
Honestly, given this, there seems to be two options. Cut bait with the quarterback (no) or find someone else to coordinate the offense (yes). Naysayers will ask how this helps the offense get better. Wouldn't changing the system make the offense even worse? For the very short term, possibly. For the long term, it couldn't possibly be a detriment, provided of course that the new playcaller be someone who is remotely competent.
The Bengals have a quarterback being paid elite-quarterback money playing at an average level. The question is not, "Is there a problem?" but rather, "How can we solve this problem?"
Bob Bratkowski spends every Saturday night killing hookers and drifters that are dumb enough to get in his car.
Bob Bratkowski would so kick your dog if you weren't looking.
Bob Bratkowski summers in Pittsburgh.
Brian Kelly offered to give Bob Bratkowski parts of his playbook that could work for the Bengals and instead of accepting said plays Bratkowski pissed on Kelly's trousers.
Bob Bratkowski gives Mike Brown a back rub every day and tells him how good a job he is doing.*
Here are the 10 teams that run most often on first down: N.Y. Jets (72
percent), St. Louis (61), Tennessee (59), Cincinnati (59), Minnesota
(58), Cleveland (57), Carolina (57), Buffalo (56) and San Diego (56).
Let's run those down:
Jets - their quarterback is a rookie turnover machine
Rams - their best player, by far and away, is Steven Jackson and their offensive line can't pass protect
Titans - neither of their quarterbacks are built to sling it around the field and they have a dynamic weapon in the backfield in Chris Johnson
Bengals - Brat
Vikings - They have the second coming of Eric Dickerson at tailback
Browns - Lady Quinn and Derek Anderson
Panthers - Jake Delhomme might be shaving points and they have a stellar running back duo
Buffalo - Need I remind you about Crazy Legs Fitzpatrick's play from last year
Chargers - Norv Turner and some strange devotion to a washed up LdT. I can't explain this one either
Forgetting for a second that Easterbrook is a moron and only listed 9 teams, look at those. Other than the Chargers and Bengals, everyone on that list has a legit reason for being there. One of three things have to happen, A) their quarterback sucks, B) they have an elite running back or C) both.
I'm totally willing to admit I was wrong on Cedric Benson, but I think it's a big stretch to put him in the class of Peterson, Johnson, and Jackson. Benson's good, but he's not that good.
That begs the question. Why, exactly, are the Bengals running the ball nearly 60 percent of the time on first down? According to Football Outsiders, the Bengals pass offense ranks 7th in the league and the run offense ranks 13th. Interestingly enough, of the top 11 total offenses, 8 of them are ranked in the top 9 in passing. Take a look:
Team
Passing Offense Rank
Total Offense Rank
New England
1
1
San Diego
2
6
Indianapolis
3
2
Minnesota
4
7
Houston
5
9
New Orleans
6
3
Cincinnati
7
17
Arizona
8
8
Pittsburgh
9
11
Looking at that, you could certainly make the argument that Minnesota should throw the ball more along with San Diego and Cincinnati. Nobody is arguing that Brad Childress is a genius though.
There are no words for Bob "The Genius" Bratkowski anymore. He is awful at his job and he will likely be rewarded for his continued brilliance by becoming the next head coach. I sincerely hope this doesn't happen but once Mikey Boy finds a good yes man he is loathe to let him go. Christ is he bad. If only there was some way to change him, to make him see the error of his ways...........
20 - Years since the Bengals have won a playoff game
0 - Total number of playoff wins in Mike Brown's tenure as owner
.359 - Bengals regular season winning percentage since Mike Brown took over as owner (115-206-1 in 20 seasons)
29-34-1 - Record since 2005 playoff game vs Steelers
6 - Seasons the Bengals have lost their first six games since 1991. No other team has more than two.
0 - Teams North of Cincinnati without an indoor practice facility
10 - Players arrested in a 14 month span from 2005-2006
32 - Mike Brown's ranking, out of 32, of the "Best Owners in the NFL" by Michael Silver of Sports Illustrated in 2007
458,000,000 - Amount, in dollars, that Hamilton County Taxpayers paid to build PBS
2032 - Year that Hamilton County will have finally paid off its debt on the stadium deal
3 - Total number of non-clerical employees employed in the Bengals scouting department, lowest in the league
747,000,000 - Amount, in dollars, paid in free agency by the Bengals from 1994 - 2005, second worst of all 28 teams in existence for the duration, behind only Arizona
118 – Ranking, out of 118 professional teams, of the “Worst Franchises” in professional sports, as ranked by ESPN the Magazine in 2003.
97 – Ranking, out of 98 general managers in all four major sports with three or more years of experience, of Mike Brown’s performance as a GM, as ranked by Forbes in 2007.